
Reply
Recent blog posts
- Former Vol Joe Thompson Says Vanderbilt is Still A Rival
- Taylor Swift's 3D Mag Cover, Snuggie Bashing, and Holiday Doggie Cards
- JOE FRUGAL: Free Dunkin' Donuts Coffee Sent To Your House
- 11/17/09 Tiger Creek Elementary 1st Grade
- 11/16/09 Ooltewah MS 6th Grade!
- JOE FRUGAL: Free Cupcakes Tuesday at Little Debbie Store in Collegedale
- Monte, Berry and Vols A No Show in Whipping by Ole Miss
- 11/12/09 Dade Elementary 2nd Grade!
- The Story Behind That Amazing Rockslide Video
- JOE FRUGAL: Veteran's Day Freebies For Vets & Family Members
AP News Video
Recent comments
- I miss Joe and his funny
3 hours 20 min ago - Great post Jim, glad you got
3 hours 21 min ago - That was a great radio team.
3 hours 21 min ago - Vanderbilt
3 hours 22 min ago - vol fans vol fans listen
12 hours 52 min ago - Gobbell
15 hours 37 min ago - Hwy 64
15 hours 57 min ago - What Law?
16 hours 20 min ago - Your comment absolutely
16 hours 24 min ago - You'll All Talk With Nonsense
16 hours 43 min ago





















what are you talking about?
well, the previous statement hardly made any sense. First, this is a still photo. The video is merely a cut zoomed in. So to say the figure is motionless is only an uneducated guess. Nasa first stated that the resolution of this image was too poor for any definite answer. They later stated that the image was only a rock formed by harsh weather conditions. These tactics have been used many times throughout the history of Nasa (when it comes to Alien Life). Without being a petrographer It is quite obvious that this rock formation is astonishingly different from any other around it. The craziest thing to me is how quick they discounted this image without either explaining their findings or posting another image that was taken. For people who desire so greatly in finding other life forms and the grand unified theory, they're sure quick to discount things like this. Or are they only discounting this from the public eye?