Reply
Recent blog posts
- Bulldogs Dominate Vols
- Tennessee-Georgia "More Than Just a Game"
- 10/10/08 This Week's Garden of the Week!
- Weekend Schedule - SEC News & Notes
- Senator Lamar Alexander Says 67,000 Tennesseans Could Refinance Home Loans
- SEC East Still Anyone's Game
- From The Archives: The New TV Seasons (from years gone by)
- Vol Network Just Not the Same
- 10/7/08 Soddy Elementary 5th Grade!
- While the rest of us get political, CBS's Bob Schieffer goes Country
AP News Video
Recent comments
- Noboma
1 day 14 hours ago - Fabulous..... finally. I
1 day 14 hours ago - Ridiculous...........
1 day 15 hours ago - Marti Rutherford
1 day 15 hours ago - AT LAST
1 day 15 hours ago - YOU DON'T KNOW SUFFERING!
1 day 16 hours ago - Just wondering if the
1 day 17 hours ago - Interesting!
1 day 17 hours ago - Disgusted
1 day 18 hours ago - Happy birthday Cassandra!!!
1 day 19 hours ago























Solar Energy
I voted all of the above so the last two would be covered. In all the technology did pan out but was not pushed by the gov't nor purchased in great quantities by us. Mainly because of the price, but I believe with the technology advancements of late we could produce this in a much more cost effective manner. It is because it is such a cheap energy source the power companies do not want us to have it. Just like windmill energy, people don't want to see a windmill in their neighborhood. These are the people that should get a life and realize we need to conserve all our resourses because if we don't noone will have coal, oil or enough nuclear energy to go around.