
Reply
Recent blog posts
- From the Archive: The Record Snow Storm of 93
- Vols Survive and Advance with Strong Second Half Performance
- Severe Weather Update..
- Flooding a problem this afternoon...
- A Stormy Morning...Here is an update.
- Tennessee Sleepwalks Through Win over LSU
- A Look At Tennessee and the SEC Tournament By The Numbers
- 3/11/10 Boyd Buchanan School 2nd Grade!
- From the Archives: Looking For Love in 1989, Grocery Store Edition
- 3/9/10 Tiger Creek Elementary Head Start-K
AP News Video
Recent comments
- GA going non-tax free back to school...LULZ
1 day 11 hours ago - Typical Southern Apoplexy
1 day 11 hours ago - Raisning LOL Get a proof
1 day 11 hours ago - howard high
1 day 11 hours ago - Howard High
1 day 13 hours ago - thats stupid
1 day 13 hours ago - Dude, you're LAME! You look
1 day 14 hours ago - YOU GOT THAT RIGHT
1 day 14 hours ago - More facts
1 day 15 hours ago - Pet-Abuse.com
1 day 15 hours ago



















Obama on a social issue - Rights or No Rights?
This comment is not about pro-choice, pro-life as pertains to abortion.
It is a comment about when children born in the USA acquire the rights and protections of the Constitution.
Most would say at birth. Mr. Obama was the ONLY senator who voted that infants who survive an abortion, should be killed. For those children, according to Mr. Obama, have no rights.
If Mr. Obama can say this about the young, he can also say the same about the old, infirm who have run out of private insurance money to pay their medical bills. They too, under this logic, can be killed, as members not contributing to society.
Do those who support Mr. Obama agree with this policy and can they just close their eyes to such and vote for him anyway? If so, the country is worse off than most would think.